翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ R U Still in 2 It
・ R U the Girl
・ R U There
・ R U Tuff Enuff
・ R Umadevi Nagaraj
・ R Ursae Minoris
・ R v Adams
・ R v Adams (1957)
・ R v Adams (South Africa)
・ R v Albert
・ R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
・ R (complexity)
・ R (cross section ratio)
・ R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
・ R (disambiguation)
R (E) v Governing Body of JFS
・ R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport
・ R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport
・ R (film)
・ R (GC) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis
・ R (Green Environmental Industries Ltd) v Hertfordshire CC
・ R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport
・ R (Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd) v Central Arbitration Committee
・ R (L) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis
・ R (Los Angeles Railway)
・ R (National Union of Journalists) v Central Arbitration Committee
・ R (New York City Subway service)
・ R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice
・ R (on the application of SG and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
・ R (Playfoot) v Millais School Governing Body


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

R (E) v Governing Body of JFS : ウィキペディア英語版
R (E) v Governing Body of JFS

''R (E) v Governing Body of JFS'' () (UKSC 15 ) is a United Kingdom discrimination case, concerning the Jewish Free School's policy of denying entry to people whom they defined as belonging to a different religion.
The United Kingdom Supreme Court held by a majority of five to four that the school had discriminated against pupils, including the claimant, "E", on the basis of race under the Race Relations Act 1976. Five of their Lordships held that the school had directly discriminated against applicant pupils and two of their Lordships held that the school was indirectly discriminating on grounds of race. The case was the first adjudicated by the newly established court.
==Facts==

In October 2006, a Jewish father made enquiries with the United Synagogue as to whether his son, born to a mother who had been converted to Judaism under the auspices of the Masorti movement, could convert under Orthodox auspices for entry to JFS in September 2007. He was advised the process could take several years and that such applications to JFS are very rarely successful given that the school is highly oversubscribed. He applied for his son but did not declare to the school's admissions board the mother's conversion history.
By April 2007, he had not supplied JFS with the requested information, whereupon the school advised him that, being oversubscribed that year, it was unlikely his son could be offered a place. He thereupon unsuccessfully appealed for reconsideration of his application.
In July 2008, the father sought to prosecute JFS on the grounds of alleged racial discrimination, but High Court judge, Mr Justice Munby, ruled contrariwise, holding JFS' selection criteria were not intrinsically different from Christian or Islamic faith schools and their being declared illegal could adversely affect "the admission arrangements in a very large number of faith schools of many different faiths and denominations".

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「R (E) v Governing Body of JFS」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.